The logistics of Noah’s Ark. People actually believe this story. It’s time for a dose of reality. The YouTubers known as KaseyAkira, Bluetrilobite, and Vashcat encouraged me to debunk the story of Noah’s Ark.
Atheist Comedy – The Great Flood
Posted by Kris Brooks on January 3rd, 2010
Posted in Kris's Blog 
Tags: animation, ark, atheist, bible, cartoon, Christianity, Comedy, creationism, debunking, flood, Funny, genesis, god, great, hovind, Noah's, old, Skit, spoof, testament, worldwide
first of all this show is funny but all of it makes sense to a people who dont believe in God and realy if u belive in God u whouldnt care about those things
YEAAAH …..good point. Why question anything when one can mindlessly follow a system established by superstitious, uneducated, oppressed hillbillies who lived throughout history spinning fairytalles to justify their own existance and suffering…
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! not funny
@tortatacos Oh yes it is. Particularly the last line.
477 comments at this point so, sorry if I’m repeating.
This reminds me of debunking Santas ride around the Earth. Same ludicrous impossibility to the point of laughter.
Sad to think that no matter what, credulous fools will believe in the Ark story.
This is the funniest video I have ever seen. People who believe this shit are retarded.
(GASP!) That would mean taking away free will! God never does that! Unless, of course, he wants to make Pharaoh look like a bigger bastard than he was so God would look better in comparison.
WOW…You are smart AND funny…..Great combination, you know. 5 stars, of course.
i want more!!!
as science and logic keeps chipping away at this mental disease called religion the zealots will wish they had a noahs ark to keep from drowning.
Lol Great job darkmatter as usuall
Its not about being wise; its common sense.
Occam’s razor FTW, lol.
who’s the music track on the end of the vid? I’m an oldster so I don’t know :- (
Pissed my pants @ 1:51
The Pixies.
Gravity remains a complete mystery to man, with Quantum Theory and Relativity mired in an unresolvable conflict as to what generates its attraction. The first calls it a force but cant qualify the mechanism and the second says its an effect. Staying in the macro realm, ninety percent of the universes energy cannot be accounted for within the matrix of spacetime or within the assumed construct of three to five fundamental forces….cont.
And that means that the Big Bang theory, apart from an intelligent designer and instigator, is errant by 96%. Only arrogant fools would postulate a theory as being true when it is in fact 96% wrong.
Turning to molecular constructs, there is no assurance that quarks and gluons represent the minutest atomic particles, but only that something smaller in scale eludes our ability to detect it or them. More befuddling still, there is no assurance these or any particles actually exist. The material world could be, and probably is, nothing more than organized manifestations of energy with everything in motion.
On the biological front, every attempt to mathematically demonstrate that life, given enough time, could have emerged by random chance from inorganic matter has failed. The fact is, the fossil record confirms that the two billion years needed for the improbable to become probable has evaporated by at least 99%, thereby rendering mans conclusions errant once again. Further, in the transition from plant to animal life, macro-evolutionary theory predicts the opposite of what we have observed.
Rather than a single and simple animal body-type gradually coming to exist from which all others were eventually evolved, every animal phyla known today burst on to the scene at the same time.
@materialclassified Thank you for giving an intelligent answer to these atheistic toe heads!
But you know as well as I do, that when presented with any mathematical quantification FOR the proving of God, they don’t listen.
It is rather unfortunate that they are at the very not open to the POSSIBILITY, ya know?
thanx bro’
@ materialclassified on the matter of biology…
That’s complete bollocks, biology has made huge progress on describing how primitive life could evolve from non-living systems. It continues to show multiple ways in which proto-cells and self replicating molecules can arise and how they can increase in complexity.
The fossil record in no way refutes natural selection or the process of evolution as we know it.
Do you enjoy making up percentages? HINT: theories are not rated in % values.
O.F.F.S.! MaterialAssified – all existant phyla categorically did NOT appear simultaneously. Nor did all the extinct phyla. What utter crap.
So which is it, three or five fundamental forces? HINT: there are FOUR.
Was that easy enough for you?
Try going back to school. The only reason legitimate scientists don’t reply to your “refutations” is because you spout gormless nonsense.